Foreign Policy: Job Description for the Next Pope: "I refer, first, to a new and aggressive secularization, borne into the heart of modern societies by the dynamics of globalization. In traditional as well as developed societies, increasing materialism opens the way to a form of secularism that is indifferent or hostile to religious faith. A second critical development bearing directly upon Catholicism's future is the fierce internal contest for the soul of Islam, the great world religion that is both the Church's main rival for adherents and its potential ally against a purely materialistic concept of human development. And finally, the advent of genetic engineering and related forms of biotechnology underscores the need to upgrade dramatically Catholic education and expertise in the sciences and in bioethics.
The pontiff who succeeds His Holiness John Paul II (Karol Wojtyla) must address these three challenges boldly. In some cases, the new pope will draw on the example of John Paul II, but he must also define new horizons of understanding for the Church. Unless the next pope perceives the links between these challenges and their roots in the context of a historic debate over the relevance of religion to humanity, Catholicism will be unable to provide a viable alternative to the extremes of intolerant religious militancy and the self-absorbed materialism of a global consumer society. "
Halfway through and I'm loving it. Appleby hits on many key and relevant points, from the viewpoint of a forward-thinking Catholic academic. The big sticking point with me is the materialism he talks about and the idea of secular humanism. It's a relentless force in today's global consumer world, as he points out, and yet it strips us of our humanity. We become a world of buyers and sellers, "satisfied" by goods rather than love and faith. This is what the Church is working against--not other faiths--but apathy. Faith is one of the few forces in this world that puts humanity in proper perspective. I know a few of my sidebar link authors like to uphold the supremacy of the individual, by I for one hold that we're weak and imperfect and need reminded of this as often as possible. Religion isn't perfect either--God is, but not neccessarilly his Church. But what religion and faith can do for us, is promote values that too often get neglected in today's world, those ideas of service and humility, forgiveness and love. The Church, at it's truest, is at the frontlines as a soldier in the fight for human rights, the poor, and the dignity of life--elements of our existence that we often misplace and forget, instead choosing to concentrate on ourselves. What I really liked about his article was Appleby's insistence on upgrading the scientific dialogue and capacities of the Church. I have found modern Catholicism to not be in conflict with many modern discoveries as much as opponents would have one believe. Evolution is accepted, and in sanctity/dignity of life issues, science backs up the Church more often than not (in matters like proving the independence of the embryo etc).
I'll admit this is a very rough post with many a flaw--I've written it in only a few minutes time without a chance to truly collect my thoughts on such weighty matters. Read the article though--it's a good one.
1 year ago
2 comments:
Very good article Steve. I think the writer (and perhaps you?) are slightly biased towards secular humanism. It's not all a soulless, consumption based orientation like politico-religious commentators make it out to be; the fact that it is so decentralized (I don't go to a secular humanist church) makes it hard to define, and thus apt to be defined by anyone who shouts loud enough. Religion hasn't monopolized caring for other humans. It's exceedingly myopic to think people are nothing without faith - people should have faith in eachother, above all else. I'm sure you'd agree, somewhat.
On a side note, I was in Beijing when the Pope died; it's interesting to see how Christian-centric America (still) is. Chinese newspapers (government control issues notwithstanding) had a few articles about it, while CNN had 24 hour coverage of it. Yep, he's still dead. Thanks CNN.
Talk to you soon!
In response:
the one thing above all that religion brings to the table that secular humanism (or a dearth of anything) doesn't: a higher power. Now, what are the implications of a higher power? Built in humility--we cannot rely on solely each other or solely other humans on this planet. Accepting a God also allows one to re-emphasise the bit of God in all of us without making divinities out of the lot of the race. By being humble and yet accepting the sanctity of each person's life, we do not hasten into making life altering (or ending) decisions about how valuable and wanted someone else's life is (issues of abortion, euthanasia, etc). Instead, we realise their essential preciousness and remove our own preferences that cloud any possible decision we could hope to make for them--we can never truly empathise and guess at someone's desires. No matter how painful that life looks to us (or how futile), we do not know and we do not feel what they do. Faith and a higher power held remind us that we are meek and imperfect men. Secular humanism attempts to raise man to a divine level, with disastrous consequences. We need a check for our egos.
Post a Comment